Quality Review
Meet the Q&PS Team
MedicASK Answers
MedicASK Answers Full List
Patient Safety Incident Report
Loss or theft of controlled substances
MedicASK
Files
PCP AIV Use in PEA
Question# 973
Is a PCP IV Autonomous allowed to administer Normal Saline Bolus to a VSA in a PEA?
Answer:
Your question has previously been answered in here https://www.rppeo.ca/paramedic-practice/medicask-about/medicask-answers-list/250-medical-directives/270-cardiac-arrest/1658-iv-fluids-in-cardiac-arrest?highlight=WyJ0aGVyZSIsInRoZXJlYWZ0ZXIiLCJ0aGVyZWZvcmUiLCJ0aGVyZSdzIiwiZ2F0aGVyZWQiLCJ0aGVyZXF1aXJlbWVudHMiLCJ0aGVyZWJ5IiwidGhlcmVzcG9uc2UiLCJvdGhlcmVkdWNhdGlvbmFsIiwiXHUyMDFjdGhlcmUiXQ==, but we offer you a summary.
Prehospital cardiac arrest literature consistently shows that the two interventions that improve outcomes are high-quality, uninterrupted CPR and early defibrillation. Care should therefore focus on optimizing these priorities.
Given the lack of cardiac arrest–specific medications within the PCP scope, there is usually no role for initiating an IV, as it can divert time and attention away from the optimization of the performance of these critical interventions. This is a population that benefits most from doing the basics exceptionally well.
While directives may permit fluid administration for hypotension, its benefit in cardiac arrest is unclear. Giving fluids to euvolemic patients is not beneficial and may be harmful by reducing coronary and cerebral perfusion(1).
Some recent studies have emerged and suggesting potential benefit (2) but the data is still limited, this has not made its way into routine practice and it would be therefore be wiser to focus on other priorities before even considering adding fluid.
In rare cases of suspected hypovolemia in patients suffering from cardiac arrest, fluids could be considered—but only after core resuscitative measures are fully optimized. In practice, attempting to administer fluids may delay or interfere with higher-impact care such as CPR, defibrillation, and airway management.
In summary, cardiac arrest management should emphasize continuous, high-quality CPR, early defibrillation and optimization of ventilation, with other interventions—including IV access and fluid administration—playing a much more limited and secondary role.
Prehospital cardiac arrest literature consistently shows that the two interventions that improve outcomes are high-quality, uninterrupted CPR and early defibrillation. Care should therefore focus on optimizing these priorities.
Given the lack of cardiac arrest–specific medications within the PCP scope, there is usually no role for initiating an IV, as it can divert time and attention away from the optimization of the performance of these critical interventions. This is a population that benefits most from doing the basics exceptionally well.
While directives may permit fluid administration for hypotension, its benefit in cardiac arrest is unclear. Giving fluids to euvolemic patients is not beneficial and may be harmful by reducing coronary and cerebral perfusion(1).
Some recent studies have emerged and suggesting potential benefit (2) but the data is still limited, this has not made its way into routine practice and it would be therefore be wiser to focus on other priorities before even considering adding fluid.
In rare cases of suspected hypovolemia in patients suffering from cardiac arrest, fluids could be considered—but only after core resuscitative measures are fully optimized. In practice, attempting to administer fluids may delay or interfere with higher-impact care such as CPR, defibrillation, and airway management.
In summary, cardiac arrest management should emphasize continuous, high-quality CPR, early defibrillation and optimization of ventilation, with other interventions—including IV access and fluid administration—playing a much more limited and secondary role.