With the current analgesia medical directive being very broad, should the ACP consider using it in the setting of pain associated with ongoing TCP? Of course there is the sedation directive and midazolam, I was just wondering how we should approach things given the new, very broad, analgesia directive?
Under the opioid toxicity medical directive there is no minimum dose mentioned for Narcan, only a max single dose of 0.8mg. Is it acceptable to give less than 0.8mg SC/IM/IN without a patch to BHP and document "conservative dosing" on the ACR?
I have a question about morphine in an inferior/right M.I. I know they're is no contraindication stated in the ALS for administering morphine in RVI, but in these situations would a patch to BHP for fentanyl be a better choice? This way you're not affecting they're blood pressure if they have never had morphine or are already boarderline with their pressure?
I recently noticed that the age at which an extremely premature neonate is to be assumed to be viable has been removed from the BLS standards. Can the RPPEO provide us with written direction as to what gestational age above which to attempt resuscitation? A clear guideline could be extremely helpful in guiding our actions on these sensitive calls.
For patients complaining of Ischemic chest pain, you choose to treat with Nitro as they meet all protocol criteria, including NO right sided involvement and STEMI negative on the 12 Lead. After administering for example, 4 sprays of Nitro, the patients discomfort fully resolves. While enroute to hospital, patient states that the discomfort has returned. The patients presentation as well as their vitals still fall under the protocol. Are we able to start the dosage from the beginning and give another 6, or are we now only able to give 2 (4 from previous episode + 2 more to equal 6 TOTAL). Cant seem to find anything in the protocol or companion document that speaks to re-onset of discomfort.
What is the standard of expectation for preparing epinephrine for endotracheal administration during a cardiac arrest where attempts to establish vascular and/or intraosseous access fail during resuscitation efforts in patients ≥12 years of age?
In the event of a ROSC followed by a rearrest is an ACP medic to continue administering EPI every 4 minutes or are we only to do the one analyze and continue CPR till receiving hospital? I seems like epi could be beneficial to the pt in re arrest as well as potential amnio however the directive nor the companion document seem to answer this question.
I have worked at two other services which ONLY carried Ventolin 2.5mg/2.5ml. to get the adult dose of 5mg we just used 2x2.5mg/2.5ml
Here in Ottawa, we carry both 2.5/2.5 and 5/2.5 concentrations and I had a partner tell me we are supposed to only use 5mg/2.5ml for adult admin as it is due to higher concentration and my partner was telling me I am being a detriment to my patient by using 2x 2.5mg/2.5mls as it takes twice as long to take effect. (According to partner)
My question is does it matter which way we administer it if it is the same dose? And both ways meet our protocol technically.
Me personally, I have always felt like I wanted it to last as long as possible hence why I like using 2.5mg in 2.5ml as it gives you 5mls of solution. which is why we only carried that at the other services as we had long transport times.